MENU
CLOSE
The Law Platform
© Copyright 2021 - 2026
The Supreme Court of Canada has recognized a new tort of intimate partner violence, holding that existing causes of action such as assault and intentional infliction of emotional distress fail to capture the distinct harm caused by coercive and controlling conduct within an intimate relationship.
The landmark decision, Ahluwalia v. Ahluwalia 2026 SCC 16, (a full copy which may be read/downloaded below) delivered on 15th May 2026, saw a majority of the Court, led by Justice Kasirer and joined by Chief Justice Wagner and Justices Martin, O'Bonsawin and Moreau, allow the appeal in part. Justice Karakatsanis wrote separately to concur in the result, while Justice Jamal, joined by Justices Côté and Rowe, dissented and would have dismissed the appeal entirely.
Background
Ms. Ahluwalia and Mr. Ahluwalia were married for sixteen years, during which Mr. Ahluwalia abused his then-wife both physically and emotionally, conduct that limited her ability to make choices within the relationship. When Mr. Ahluwalia commenced divorce proceedings, Ms. Ahluwalia consented to the divorce but sought sole decision-making authority over their children, child support, spousal support, equalization of family property, sale of the matrimonial home, and damages for the abuse she had suffered.
The trial judge recognized a new tort of family violence and awarded Ms. Ahluwalia compensatory, aggravated and punitive damages on that basis, while indicating that she would have arrived at the same award under the existing torts of assault and intentional infliction of emotional distress had she not recognized the new tort.
Mr. Ahluwalia appealed to the Court of Appeal for Ontario, conceding that his abusive conduct gave rise to liability under the existing torts but challenging the recognition of a standalone tort of domestic violence. The Court of Appeal agreed with him, declined to recognize a new tort of domestic violence or coercive control, and reduced the damages the trial judge had awarded. Ms. Ahluwalia then appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada.
The Majority's Reasoning
23rd Oct, 2026
23rd Oct, 2026
21st Oct, 2026
20th Oct, 2026
17th Oct, 2026
Justice Kasirer found that the existing torts, taken individually or together, could not fully capture this harm. Assault, he noted, may address discrete acts of physical or threatened violence, while intentional infliction of emotional distress may capture serious psychological harm, but neither tort is designed to address the separate and cumulative harm of coercive control, which operates by limiting a person's ability to make free choices and by rendering them unequal within the relationship over time.
He went on to set out the elements a plaintiff must establish to succeed in a claim for the new tort: that the wrongful conduct occurred during an intimate relationship or after its breakdown, that the defendant intentionally engaged in abusive conduct, and that the conduct, viewed in its full context, amounted to coercive control.
Applying this framework, the majority found that Ms. Ahluwalia had established each element. Mr. Ahluwalia's conduct had controlled her and undermined her dignity, autonomy and equality within the marriage, placing the harm squarely within the scope of the newly recognized tort and entitling her to damages under it.
Decision
The Supreme Court of Canada allowed Ms. Ahluwalia's appeal in part, recognizing the tort of intimate partner violence as a distinct cause of action in Canadian law and restoring her entitlement to damages on that basis, against the dissent of three judges who would have upheld the Court of Appeal's refusal to recognize the new tort.
READ/DOWNLOAD DECISION BELOW:
Unlock premium articles, PDF downloads, cases and more
Learn how to subscribe